-
Peter Preston proposes that newsgathering be funded through a new broadband tax, but not for "bloggers or celebrity chat: just serious, factual stuff". Well, I guess it would be easier than *persuading* people to pay for news.
- BROWSE / IN TIMELINE
- « links for 2009-04-17
- » links for 2009-04-25
- BROWSE / IN Links of the day
- « links for 2009-04-17
- » links for 2009-04-25
COMMENTS / 4 COMMENTS
Daily News About Celebrity : Best links of Monday, 20 April 2009 about Celebrity thought this on Apr 20 09 at 11:29 am[...] links for 2009-04-20 | Completetosh.com, by Neil McIntosh [...]
Armin thought this on Apr 20 09 at 12:41 pmSo who defines what is “serious, factual stuff”?
Does that exclude some of the tabloids because a lot of what they report isn’t serious and even less factual? What about all the opinion pages in the papers, will they be covered?
And what about bloggers who actually do write about actual events and report about them? Do they get a slice of the cake? I regularly write about factual topics and “report” some of the things happening on Islay, does that mean I qualify even though I’m “only a blogger”?
REG CROWDER thought this on Apr 21 09 at 6:34 pmFor me, the idea of an internet license fee is a non-starter. I have nothing against the BBC continuing to get its money. I think their shockingly Orwellian announcements warning that if you don’t pay, they will hunt you down like dog, are utterly suicidal for the BBC. It just shows you how destructive it is to one’s own ethical values to get money from the people by using government power. That’s THEIR problem, not mine.
But I digress.
Funding news through a government tax would simply further isolate the news business from its audience. However, the concept is so out of touch with reality that I am confident it will disappear without a trace, in the blink of an eye. So, I’m not even going to bother arguing any further against it.
However, there are serious people in this world giving this whole thing some serious thought. I recommend: “J-Schools Play Catchup” by Brian Stelter, The New York Times, April 14, 2009.
This is the URL:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04.....wanted=all
Don’t be discouraged if The New York Times asks you for a little information, before they let you read it. They’re just trying to make a living. Fill out their little form, if they insist, and you can read it for free.
REG CROWDER thought this on Apr 25 09 at 6:10 pmThere are realistic options for funding high-quality news content that are profoundly superior to going to the government and begging for money. I’d like to make sure the world knows there are some very real alternatives to Peter Preston’s idea of an internet license fee.
Communities are key in building websites’ advertiser support
By Robert Niles
Posted: 2009-04-21http://www.ojr.org/ojr/people/robert/200904/1700/
Do we really need large organizations to do good journalism?
By Robert Niles
Posted: 2009-04-24http://www.ojr.org/ojr/people/robert/200904/1703/
New grassroots life for investigative reporting?
By David Westphal
Posted: 2009-04-09http://www.ojr.org/ojr/people/.....0904/1693/
And for more, a good place to start would be the Home Page for the Knight Digital Media center, at this URL:
http://www.knightdigitalmediacenter.org/
Enjoy!
SPEAK / ADD YOUR COMMENT
Comments are moderated. I'll delete unpleasantness. Email me if you spot a comment that crosses the line.











Your comments