<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2009-04-14</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/04/14/links-for-2009-04-14/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/04/14/links-for-2009-04-14/</link>
	<description>by Neil McIntosh</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 13:45:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: REG CROWDER</title>
		<link>http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/04/14/links-for-2009-04-14/comment-page-1/#comment-104600</link>
		<dc:creator>REG CROWDER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/04/14/links-for-2009-04-14/#comment-104600</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this one.

The extract you put on the blog is a pretty good summary of the full article in The New Yorker. Reading the whole New Yorker piece is definitely worth the time. I got a traditional journalism school education in the U.S., so the material was familiar to me. But it never hurts to reaffirm the faith. And I&#039;ve never seen anything in The New Yorker that was really badly written.

But getting back to the point: It takes a real human with an interesting or provocative perspective to make a newspaper, magazine or website really, oh, &quot;sing.&quot; So true.

This works on the broadcast side, too.  If you have a little time, wander around they Sky satellite and spend a few minutes on Russia Today -- known to its close, personal friends as &quot;RT.&quot;

I don&#039;t know who the personality is behind it.  But I can feel the influence of somebody, or maybe a tight little group, who still loves the news business, still gets charged up about, never runs out of new ways to go about it. Frankly, I was surprised that I enjoyed &quot;RT.&quot;

And the website isn&#039;t half bad.  You&#039;ll find it at this URL:
http://www.russiatoday.com/

Be patient. I find it a little slow loading sometimes.

REG CROWDER
Financial &amp; Investment Writer
London, England &amp; Brittany, France</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this one.</p>
<p>The extract you put on the blog is a pretty good summary of the full article in The New Yorker. Reading the whole New Yorker piece is definitely worth the time. I got a traditional journalism school education in the U.S., so the material was familiar to me. But it never hurts to reaffirm the faith. And I&#8217;ve never seen anything in The New Yorker that was really badly written.</p>
<p>But getting back to the point: It takes a real human with an interesting or provocative perspective to make a newspaper, magazine or website really, oh, &#8220;sing.&#8221; So true.</p>
<p>This works on the broadcast side, too.  If you have a little time, wander around they Sky satellite and spend a few minutes on Russia Today &#8212; known to its close, personal friends as &#8220;RT.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know who the personality is behind it.  But I can feel the influence of somebody, or maybe a tight little group, who still loves the news business, still gets charged up about, never runs out of new ways to go about it. Frankly, I was surprised that I enjoyed &#8220;RT.&#8221;</p>
<p>And the website isn&#8217;t half bad.  You&#8217;ll find it at this URL:<br />
<a href="http://www.russiatoday.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.russiatoday.com/</a></p>
<p>Be patient. I find it a little slow loading sometimes.</p>
<p>REG CROWDER<br />
Financial &amp; Investment Writer<br />
London, England &amp; Brittany, France</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

