<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2009-01-05</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/01/05/links-for-2009-01-05/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/01/05/links-for-2009-01-05/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:32:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fin Wycherley</title>
		<link>http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/01/05/links-for-2009-01-05/comment-page-1/#comment-79657</link>
		<dc:creator>Fin Wycherley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/01/05/links-for-2009-01-05/#comment-79657</guid>
		<description>They&#039;ve only gone n taken it off YouTube, now.

Fin :(((</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ve only gone n taken it off YouTube, now.</p>
<p>Fin <img src='http://www.completetosh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> ((</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig McGill</title>
		<link>http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/01/05/links-for-2009-01-05/comment-page-1/#comment-79280</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig McGill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/01/05/links-for-2009-01-05/#comment-79280</guid>
		<description>I saw something similar to that commentary a while ago and thought it would be great to have three channels for each game - one neutral and one for each side - but was told that to do it outwith the authorised content provider (Setanta, Sky, etc) would be setting you up for breach of copyright. Also the clubs might not be too happy with some of the comments that are made...

It&#039;s great, but again it comes back to old media not seeing an opportunity of the new - or being too brand protective. (see also the continuing middle classing of football - an argument that&#039;s more than a decade old. Heck, it was old when I wrote about it in 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.co.uk/Football-Inc-Soccer-Fans-Losing/dp/1901250520&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Football Inc&lt;/a&gt;.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw something similar to that commentary a while ago and thought it would be great to have three channels for each game &#8211; one neutral and one for each side &#8211; but was told that to do it outwith the authorised content provider (Setanta, Sky, etc) would be setting you up for breach of copyright. Also the clubs might not be too happy with some of the comments that are made&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s great, but again it comes back to old media not seeing an opportunity of the new &#8211; or being too brand protective. (see also the continuing middle classing of football &#8211; an argument that&#8217;s more than a decade old. Heck, it was old when I wrote about it in<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Football-Inc-Soccer-Fans-Losing/dp/1901250520" rel="nofollow">Football Inc</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
