<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Number 10&#8242;s site highlights what is social, and what is not</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2008/08/14/number-10-highlights-what-is-social-and-what-is-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2008/08/14/number-10-highlights-what-is-social-and-what-is-not/</link>
	<description>by Neil McIntosh</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 13:45:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun MIlne</title>
		<link>http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2008/08/14/number-10-highlights-what-is-social-and-what-is-not/comment-page-1/#comment-33301</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun MIlne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.completetosh.com/?p=801#comment-33301</guid>
		<description>Could it be simply that the Government of the day has been bounced into doing something it feels it &#039;ought&#039; to do, rather than something it actually &#039;wants&#039; to do, and embraced something that &#039;sounds like a good idea&#039; and &#039;works for that Obama chap&#039; - without fully understanding how to execute it.
Like many projects, it IS a good idea, but smacks of being rushed through in a PR panic and can surely only improve with either age .... or once it finally does away with Auntie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it be simply that the Government of the day has been bounced into doing something it feels it &#8216;ought&#8217; to do, rather than something it actually &#8216;wants&#8217; to do, and embraced something that &#8216;sounds like a good idea&#8217; and &#8216;works for that Obama chap&#8217; &#8211; without fully understanding how to execute it.<br />
Like many projects, it IS a good idea, but smacks of being rushed through in a PR panic and can surely only improve with either age &#8230;. or once it finally does away with Auntie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knackeredhack</title>
		<link>http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2008/08/14/number-10-highlights-what-is-social-and-what-is-not/comment-page-1/#comment-33228</link>
		<dc:creator>knackeredhack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.completetosh.com/?p=801#comment-33228</guid>
		<description>Neil
It&#039;s not so long ago that I sent a reporter down to his first lobby briefing for him to return red-faced, laughing at his own embarrassment: he&#039;d sat, IIRC, in Michael White&#039;s chair. Of course, he was the only journalist in the briefing room who didn&#039;t know it was Michael White&#039;s chair. 

From my own perspective out in the long-tail, I was very surprised to see No 10&#039;s Twitter experiment, indeed skeptical. But from my limited exposure to it, it indicates to me that government is suddenly porous in a way that was inconceivable when access to No 10 was dictated by unwritten seating arrangements. And it means at least one person in Downing Street can enjoy something I like to call Gordonfreude, even if it&#039;s best they keep quiet about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil<br />
It&#8217;s not so long ago that I sent a reporter down to his first lobby briefing for him to return red-faced, laughing at his own embarrassment: he&#8217;d sat, IIRC, in Michael White&#8217;s chair. Of course, he was the only journalist in the briefing room who didn&#8217;t know it was Michael White&#8217;s chair. </p>
<p>From my own perspective out in the long-tail, I was very surprised to see No 10&#8242;s Twitter experiment, indeed skeptical. But from my limited exposure to it, it indicates to me that government is suddenly porous in a way that was inconceivable when access to No 10 was dictated by unwritten seating arrangements. And it means at least one person in Downing Street can enjoy something I like to call Gordonfreude, even if it&#8217;s best they keep quiet about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2008/08/14/number-10-highlights-what-is-social-and-what-is-not/comment-page-1/#comment-33167</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.completetosh.com/?p=801#comment-33167</guid>
		<description>eek! I know I&#039;m in trouble when people are using the g-word about me :)

I think one issue is that Government2.0, Enterprise2.0, Newspapers2.0 etc. and Web2.0 all face slightly different problems in becoming more transparent but it&#039;s tempting to think that they&#039;re all doing the same thing and that the same solutions are required.

argh! I&#039;m going to have to write another post about it, I don&#039;t want to clog up your comments...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eek! I know I&#8217;m in trouble when people are using the g-word about me <img src='http://www.completetosh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I think one issue is that Government2.0, Enterprise2.0, Newspapers2.0 etc. and Web2.0 all face slightly different problems in becoming more transparent but it&#8217;s tempting to think that they&#8217;re all doing the same thing and that the same solutions are required.</p>
<p>argh! I&#8217;m going to have to write another post about it, I don&#8217;t want to clog up your comments&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

