<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikinews, anyone?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2004/10/26/wikinews-anyone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2004/10/26/wikinews-anyone/</link>
	<description>by Neil McIntosh</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 13:45:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nik</title>
		<link>http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2004/10/26/wikinews-anyone/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Nik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69.89.31.92/~complew7/?p=139#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Bottom to top...

Trust: My guess is people will know how much to trust wikinews, and regard it accordingly.

The blogosphere: Absolutely. Blogs are the eye witness of accounts of news big and small. Well, mostly small, but a few big. Though I can&#039;t see anyone being able to give a first hand account of a really terrific story and posting it to wikinews, when they could sell their story to the Daily Mail (or get a job there) instead.

Perishable: Now that&#039;s really interesting. Wikipedia works well in part because people have time to get it right. And there&#039;s another successful model: open source software - collaboration on something durable. News doesn&#039;t pass the durability test. But there must be other candidates that are durable... how do fancy starting a wikiart project?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bottom to top&#8230;</p>
<p>Trust: My guess is people will know how much to trust wikinews, and regard it accordingly.</p>
<p>The blogosphere: Absolutely. Blogs are the eye witness of accounts of news big and small. Well, mostly small, but a few big. Though I can&#8217;t see anyone being able to give a first hand account of a really terrific story and posting it to wikinews, when they could sell their story to the Daily Mail (or get a job there) instead.</p>
<p>Perishable: Now that&#8217;s really interesting. Wikipedia works well in part because people have time to get it right. And there&#8217;s another successful model: open source software &#8211; collaboration on something durable. News doesn&#8217;t pass the durability test. But there must be other candidates that are durable&#8230; how do fancy starting a wikiart project?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

